From police departments and libraries to museums and community colleges, many marketing professionals across the nation found a new marketing … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aBvMzy
via IFTTT
(MENAFN Press) Kolkata, WB, India (July 30, 2016):- Seotrainingkolkata offers courses on Digital marketing, SEO training in Kolkata and Website … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aBvNDJ
via IFTTT
We are a growing online store. We are looking for French native speaker who is able to promote our site to France. - Part-time job at your convenient … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2anaMzJ
via IFTTT
The biggest musicians and actors bombard us with tweets, puffy magazine stories and online marketing until their “brands” are ubiquitous. But part of it … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2anaKb6
via IFTTT
52% of marketers believe that video marketing is effective for brand awareness, lead generation (45%), and online engagement (42%). Last year … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aHdkFp
via IFTTT
Businesses design specific marketing strategies to woo their prospective customers. The internet has brought the world on the same digital platform … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aFfCb9
via IFTTT
Senior PHP Developer - Top Internet Marketing Firm jobs at CyberCoders in Draper, UT. http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aHe7WV
via IFTTT
It designs and delivers its online marketing services primarily on its Baidu.com Website to its online marketing customers. As of December 31 2014 the … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aFf6tD
via IFTTT
CityPeople, Internet marketing. . Perm, ul. Yekaterininskaya, 75, of. 501. Opening hours: Mon-Fri 10:00 AM–8:00 PM. Route: how to get there. http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aFeRir
via IFTTT
Ivan Lopez, President of Ultimate Performance and Fitness, came to GoMarketing, a local digital marketing and web development firm, needing an … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aHdFIh
via IFTTT
In the current digital age, the thoughts you share on social media and on the Internet can have a serious impact on the way people perceive you. http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aHeel0
via IFTTT
said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. Carinsurancehints.com is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto … http://ift.tt/23GTdeA
from Internet Marketing http://ift.tt/2aFfCYW
via IFTTT
With more than a billion users, and billions of daily video views, gaining user attention on YouTube may seem a daunting prospect.
However, the sheer size of the audience (a third of all web users) means that the rewards are there if you get it right.
In this post, I’ll look at some of the factors which determine YouTube video rankings, some tips to help improve visibility, and some of the factors behind how Google chooses to show videos in its search results pages.
I’ve split this into visible and invisible factors, i.e. those that can be seen by general users and those used for internal purposes.
Thanks to PI Datametrics for their help in compiling these ranking factors.
A distinct YouTube channel can help give brands (or anyone) a longer term and more effective YouTube presence. There are some useful tips on this from YouTube.
Though John Lewis is better known for its Christmas ads, rival retailer Sainsbury’s manages to out-perform it in terms of YouTube visibility.
This detailed post from PI Datametrics explains in more detail, but Sainsbury’s is more consistent with branding, produces more content, and seems to work harder to optimise it.
Learning from the ranking factors listed above will do a lot, but here’s a few more tips:
All this data can help you to learn from what does and doesn’t work, and to improve the effectiveness of your video content.
Imagine a world where Google has no secrets, where all search engines play fair, and where SEO doesn’t have to be synonymous with “page one.” Sound like a fairy tale?
The Internet is often cast as the great democratizer, and Google its noble gate-keeper. There’s no doubt that search engines help us easily navigate the web, but we have to remember that Google is a corporation, not a public service.
Our faith in its wisdom and guidance is based on little more than a carefully planned PR scheme. Behind that curtain, few of us really have any idea what’s going on. That kind of blind trust may be dangerous for content creators and consumers alike, both in terms of what we see and what we get.
In a recent column for U.S. News & World Report, artificial intelligence expert Dr. Robert Epstein detailed 10 different ways Google uses blacklists to censor the Internet. Some of them seem perfectly within reason – noble, even: banning weapons sales through its shopping service, for instance, or blocking payday loan sharks from AdWords.
Few are going to argue with these measures. In fact, it’s nice to see a little corporate responsibility every once in awhile.
At the same time, though, how can we know when and where to draw the line? At what point does “corporate responsibility” become a catch-all phrase for “Google does what Google wants”?
The point Epstein makes is that with virtually every case of good Samaritan censorship practiced by the “do no evil” company, similar tactics have been used to justify some pretty blatant power grabs or downright bullying.
When media sources in Spain began demanding that aggregators pay fees for content, for example, Google News simply pulled out of the country altogether, and Spanish-based digital news sources have taken a serious hit since.
Consider too, the case of E-Ventures Worldwide, an SEO service website that had all 365 pages of its site blacklisted from search engine results because Google deemed them “pure spam.”
True, these revelations are not shocking for people who deal in SEO. Our line of work more or less entails tracking and following every algorithm-scented footprint or bit of guano we can find that might lead us to the keys of Google’s ranking systems, even while we live in constant fear of punishment from its all-knowing servers.
It comes as no surprise that Google harbors a tremendous power to influence, say, the results of a certain upcoming political election, or even to sway public opinion on the latest Taylor Swift/Kanye West escapade. The question is – and it’s a contentious one – where does it all end?
At what point (and sooner or later, there must come a point) will the authorities and powers-that-be have to reign in Google’s master controls over internet content and searchability?
After all, the FCC’s net neutrality ruling last year made internet service practically a public utility – in regulation, if not in name. And after broadband service providers, no one has more influence and control over the flow of the web than Google does.
“If Google were just another mom-and-pop shop with a sign saying ‘we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone’, that would be one thing,” Epstein writes. “But as the golden gateway to all knowledge, Google has rapidly become an essential in people’s lives – nearly as essential as air or water. We don’t let public utilities make arbitrary and secretive decisions about denying people services; we shouldn’t let Google do so either.”
The day of reckoning for Google may come sooner than you might think.
Despite a long line of similar cases that have, without exception, ruled in Google’s favor – giving them free range to rank and rate content in whatever way they please – the E-Ventures case in Florida is actually making some headway.
Back in May, the federal judge on the case ruled that Google had “anti-competitive, economic” motives for blacklisting E-Ventures’ pages: the better SEO companies are at their jobs, after all, the less businesses need to pay for AdWords, which is how the search engine makes most of their revenue. It’s not, as Google argues, simply a matter of “free speech” anymore.
On a larger scale, the European Union is also trying to crack down on Google’s Internet monopoly.
Google claims 90% of the search engine market across the continent (compared to just 64% in the US), and while there’s nothing inherently wrong with that, the European Commission’s competition chief, Margrethe Vestager, says the company is unfairly using that leverage to promote its own advertising materials over that of the competition’s.
This is the third shot the EU has fired at Google in less than two years. Previously, Vestager & co. have filed antitrust complaints against the company over their search engine dominance and over the mandatory Google apps that come pre-loaded with every Android phone. “Google’s magnificent innovations don’t give it the right to deny competitors the chance to innovate,” Vestager says.
All three charges will likely come to a head before the summer’s through. So far, Google has, of course, denied any wrongdoing. But if the Commission succeeds in making a case, Google may have to pay as much as 10% of its revenue (i.e., in the neighborhood of $7 billion per annum) to the European Union to foster a more open, inclusive market.
It all begs the question: what would an SEO world look like where Google wasn’t necessarily the prime target of our efforts? Furthermore, what would happen to SEO analytics if Google’s criteria was for page rankings were completely transparent?
Experts have been saying for years that SEO strategies should be thinking outside the Google search box, but few other engines have been able to make so much as a dent in the web.
Bing, by comparison, is still only a tiny blip on the radar, with 14 billion indexed pages to Google’s 45 billion. The fastest-growing search engine on the scene is DuckDuckGo, a service that brags enhanced privacy and security.
While they manage to pull in 100 million visits every month, it’s still not much compared to Google’s 100 billion. Meanwhile, social media is trafficking more content than ever, and other search services like Yelp and Flickr have cornered markets where Google lags behind.
If the European Union has its way, more competing search engines might be able to increase their power, size, and scope – and forever change the internet landscape as we know it.
The bottom line: There is a world outside of Google. But will we know what to do with it once we’re there?
Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web. The post SearchCap: AdWords reports, CTR data & Google Maps ads appeared first on Search Engine Land.
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
Google Maps ads are changing to help local businesses become more visible. Columnist Will Scott discusses the four features you should be most excited about. The post Excited about Google’s new map ads? You should be! appeared first on Search Engine Land.
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
The agency looked at expanded text ad performance from both brand and non-brand traffic. The post Merkle’s early data on expanded text ad CTRs: Results are mixed appeared first on Search Engine Land.
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
In this week’s Search In Pictures, here are the latest images culled from the web, showing what people eat at the search engine companies, how they play, who they meet, where they speak, what toys they have and more. Google’s Gary Illyes in scary clown mask Source: Twitter Real Google…
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
New to the world of search engine optimization (SEO)? Columnist John Lincoln explains some things you might not know about this online marketing discipline. The post 9 things most people don’t understand about SEO appeared first on Search Engine Land.
Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.
